Open and Responsible Research Guide: Choosing a publication channel

Choosing a publication channel

Selecting the right publication channel is an important part of the publishing process and responsible research practices. A carefully considered decision supports the visibility and impact of your research. The following steps will help you identify a suitable publication for your work.

1. Define your objectives

  • Consider who you want to reach with your publication: the academic community, professional audience, decision-makers, or the general public?
  • What language will best reach your target audience?
  • What type of publication will you choose? See the Publication data collection instructions for publication authors.
  • Consider whether your goal is, for example, impact, rapid publication, or open access.
  • Also take into account whether your funders or collaborators have specific requirements regarding the publication channel. The Journal Checker Tool is a useful resource for checking whether a journal meets your funder's open access requirements. You can read here about research funders' open access policies.

2. Find suitable publication channels

When choosing a publication channel, pay attention to the following:

  • Consider the journal’s target audience. Check the journal’s website for its Aims and Scope and Submission Guidelines.
  • Review previously published articles and their subject areas.
  • Familiarize yourself with the journal’s peer review process.
  • Examine the available license options. These indicate under what terms your article will be openly accessible and reusable.
  • Learn about the journal’s open access policies and any potential APC fees (Article Processing Charges).

Tools to find scientific channels: 

Reference Databases (e.g., Web of Science and Scopus)

Search for literature related to your research topic using multidisciplinary databases such as Scopus or Web of Science, or databases specific to your field. You can narrow down your search results using the filtering tools on the left-hand side of the interface. These tools often also show which journals the articles in your results have been published in. This way, you can compile a list of potential journals that might be suitable for your article.

Finding a Suitable Publication Channel Using Your Manuscript’s Title and Abstract
  • Web of Science Master Journal List – Search among approximately 22,000 journals indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection. The Match Manuscript tool allows you to input your title and abstract to find journals relevant to your topic.
  • Elsevier Journal Finder suggests suitable journals published by Elsevier.
  • Wiley Journal Finder recommends journals from Wiley’s portfolio.
  • IEEE Publication Recommender suggests appropriate journals and conferences from IEEE.
  • Springer Nature Journal Suggester recommends journals and shows whether your university or research organization is part of Springer Nature’s open access agreement.
Finding a Discipline-Specific Publication Channel
  • In the JUFO Portal (Publication Forum), you can search for suitable journals, conferences, and book publishers that are part of the Finnish classification system. The portal allows you to search for journals evaluated by the Publication Forum using three different classification schemes: MinEdu, Web of Science (WoS), or Scopus.

  • In Journal Citation Reports (JCR), you can search for suitable publication channels across more than 250 subject categories indexed in the Web of Science database.

  • The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) allows you to search for open access scholarly journals across more than 500 disciplines.

 

3. Evaluate the reliability of the publication channel

You can assess the reliability of a journal by checking the following:

 

4. Evaluate the impact of the publication channel

The impact of a journal can be evaluated using various metrics and tools that provide insights into its scientific impact, citation rates, and visibility.

  • Bibliometric Indicators

  • Other Tools and Indicators

    • Indexing in major databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, or PubMed improves discoverability and visibility, making your publication easier to find, read, and cite.
    • JUFO (Publication Forum) is a Finnish expert-based classification system that evaluates the scientific quality and impact of journals, conferences, and publishers. Search results can be filtered by JUFO level and openness.
    • DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) lists high-quality open access journals that meet specific criteria and are accepted through an application process.
    • Altmetric – The Journals section shows the attention a journal receives in social media and other online platforms.
    • Overton – A database that tracks citations of journal articles in policy documents, helping assess societal impact.

5. Avoid questionable journals

Predatory journals are open access publications whose primary goal is to profit from author fees rather than to uphold scholarly standards. These journals may promise rapid publication, but often lack proper peer review, or the review may not be conducted by qualified experts. Long-term preservation of published articles may also be uncertain.

How to Identify predatory journals:

  • Is the journal indexed in Scopus, Web of Science, or another key database in your field? Note that what matters is the journal’s current indexing status, as a journal can also be removed from a database.

  • Is the journal listed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)? DOAJ accepts high-quality, peer-reviewed open access journals through an application process. Note that absence from DOAJ does not automatically mean a journal is predatory.

  • Has the journal been evaluated in JUFO (Publication Forum) and received at least Level 1? Journals at Level 0 have not been recognized as scientific, and may include suspected predatory journals.

  • Critically examine the journal’s website for transparency, editorial board information, and publication practices.

  • Use the Think.Check.Submit. checklist and video to evaluate journals.

  • Use the Think.Check.Attend. checklist to evaluate conferences.

 

6. Finalize your choice of publication channel

Once you have identified potential publication channels that match your research topic, compare their publishing practices, target audiences, and objectives.
Review the journal’s Aims and Scope section and recent articles to ensure your research aligns with the journal’s focus and priorities.

When making the final decision, also consider practical aspects such as openness and available license options, potential publication fees, funder requirements, the quality of the peer review process, and the journal’s publication schedule and timelines.

By taking these factors into account, you can ensure your research reaches the right audience and progresses smoothly through the publication process.